Climate risk, screened for the boardroom.
We screen every asset in a portfolio for physical climate risk and assess transition exposure using organisational emissions, financial data and NGFS carbon-price pathways. The result is banded, scenario-aware evidence boards can use and auditors can trace to its inputs, assumptions and methods. Transparent on sources, disciplined about what screening can and cannot tell you.
- Portfolio-scale
- screening
- From a single site to thousands of locations, without restricting the analysis to a small sample.
- 0.25°
- global climate backbone
- A consistent global grid, supplemented by hazard-specific datasets at their native resolution.
- 8 + 1
- governed hazards + integrated flood
- Eight governed hazard models plus an integrated flood view, each versioned and governed.
- 4 + NGFS
- scenarios, baseline + 3 horizons
- SSP1-2.6 → SSP5-8.5 and NGFS Phase 5.1, across baseline 2025, 2030, 2040 and 2050.
Physical and transition risk, on one platform
Three lenses on climate risk, all returning results that compare across a portfolio and map straight to disclosure.
Physical risk
Eight governed hazard models plus an integrated flood view. Coastal, river, pluvial and integrated flood, tropical cyclone, extreme heat, extreme cold, landslide and drought, each screening every asset on a consistent global climate backbone, supplemented by hazard-specific datasets, across the SSP scenarios and horizons.
Learn more →Transition risk
NGFS Phase 5.1 carbon prices applied to entered Scope 1 and 2 emissions show what carbon costs under the Orderly, Disorderly, Too Little Too Late and Hot House World pathways, expressed as net cost as a % of revenue and of OPEX.
Learn more →Disclosure-ready
Every output is framed for IFRS S2 and TCFD: physical and transition risk identification, scenario resilience and the metrics that go in the report.
Learn more →Band first, then trajectory
Every asset lands in a Low, Medium or High band on a common axis. Read the band to see today's exposure, then the trajectory to see where it heads under each scenario.
- Low — Limited screening exposure under the assessed conditions
- Medium — Elevated screening exposure worth monitoring and planning for
- High — Priority exposure requiring more detailed review using site-specific information
A High band means "investigate with site-level detail": it prioritises where deeper study earns its keep, not a prediction of loss. How to read a screening result →
Illustrative single-asset trajectory under SSP5-8.5.
Why we exist
High-quality screening, within reach
Rigorous, asset-level climate screening was long the preserve of the largest balance sheets: for a company with hundreds or thousands of sites, screening every asset at credible quality was simply unaffordable. We pair governed models, anchored to public, peer-reviewed climate science, with an efficient, repeatable pipeline, so thorough screening scales to portfolios of any size and is priced within reach of far more than a handful of firms.
Read our story →Eight governed hazards, an integrated flood view and transition screening
Each model publishes its inputs, sources and what the bands mean, anchored to public, peer-reviewed climate science.
Coastal flooding
Compound coastal water levels: sea-level rise, tides and storm surge read together at the shoreline.
View modelRiver (fluvial) flooding
Where rivers overtop their banks, and how that exposure shifts as the climate warms.
View modelPluvial (surface-water) flooding
Intense rainfall overwhelming local drainage: the flooding that happens away from rivers.
View modelIntegrated flooding
River and surface-water flood exposure read together on one band-aligned axis.
View modelTropical cyclone
Cyclone wind exposure from historical tracks, scaled to a warming world.
View modelExtreme heat
Heat stress on people, processes and assets, indexed across scenarios and horizons.
View modelDecision-useful for management, traceable for audit review
Transparent inputs, governed models
We publish every input, data source and what each band means, so you can audit the provenance of a result and trace it back to public, peer-reviewed science.
Honest about screening
A High band means "investigate with site-level detail", not "loss expected". We tell you where detailed engineering or financial study earns its keep, and where it does not.
One comparable axis
Every physical hazard is translated onto the same prioritisation scale, allowing unlike hazards to be compared consistently across the portfolio, so it can be ranked rather than just listed.
Governed and versioned
Each hazard is assessed with a single governed model under formal version and change control, anchored to public science (CMIP6, ISIMIP3b, NGFS Phase 5.1 and IPCC AR6) and documented so a result can be traced to its method.
Bring scenario analysis to your next disclosure.
From a single site to a global portfolio, screened, banded and ready for the report.